Definite Maybe

If it's possible to threaten torture or coerce a person into confession of a crime. Then it must be possible to promise immunity to achieve the same results. If a person is guilty of anything, that person might answer inappropriately if they think the interrogation will cease in order to walk free. Saving your own skin. Most of us have done something in our past that we would sooner not talk about, not me however. Swaying public opinion with unproven charges that will discredit a person as long as the investigation continues will no doubt cause a lengthy investigation. Utilizing this information it's possible  for a master to create truth without basis or fact. Done all the time, especially when all the information is quite literally unrelated. Validating warning threats from Senator Chuck Shumer that attacking the FBI isn't smart "as they have six ways from Sunday to get even" I think we must be well into the thirties ways from Sunday for firing Comey. It always helps if you can fabricate a document of proposed facts and then confirm this tall tale yarn with wordsmith from Yahoo News as backup. I watched James Comey on several interviews (book sales) where he was asked a number of questions surrounding his time as FBI Director.  Mostly of his involvement with exoneration of Hillary's E-mails, Applications to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts and his termination from the FBI. The first example of his answers shows he wears a lot of hats. Shifting from FBI Director to Private Citizen and then Author. Using each hat to answer or not at his discretion. Pleading that the FISA Application to achieve a warrant to trample a citizens civil rights contained more than just the information in the Steele Dossier. The other recollection of information contained cannot be disclosed and therefore we will assume it's information is just as bogus as the Steele Documents. Listening to comments of "The President not being fit for Office" or the size of his hands is saturated in opinion. If so  President Trump finds himself in good company with FDR. Eisenhower, Kennedy and the Mayor of Nashville to name  only a few.  Not because of their glove size either. Or we could also include a number of high level FBI Investigators/ Fornicators/Fabricators working for Comey. I'm not an attorney but still aware if any part of a testimony is found to be false, then all of the testimony is  scuttled. Using our own laws the FISA Application should receive the same treatments. Remembering back to then FBI Director 2 weeks before the election he determined and announced that Hillary Clinton was found to have lied about her E-mails. Then Director Comey said he believed she was not aware of her mistake. Therefore, Innocent by Incompetence. Sounds vaguely familiar to his own defense today. Not Guilty By Reason of Incompetence is his own assessments of his leaking bogus unproven classified information as business as usual. Webster's Dictionary defines a lie as speaking to anything not true. Where as Perjury is speaking to anything knowing it's false. Comey's friend Daniel Richmond who he asked to release information to the press also wears many hats, one as long time friend then as unpaid FBI worker and again as Columbia University of Law College Professor. (kinda funny grown men acting like fraternity brothers hazing) Each hat can be used as evidence or as excuse to evade questions within a single interview. The good news is; recently Trump was found not to have colluded with the Russians in Election meddling and Trump Jr used  poor judgments at Trump Tower meetings. As for Comey he was fired for incompetence at performing his job and vastly unable to separate lies from perjury. This writer has concluded that regardless of Mueller's FBI Investigations and including some of admissions of guilt for lying, the overall impact seems to be aimed at more political sniper fire than US Election. The FBI should stop kicking down doors of New York attorneys in hopes of tying Trump to a Las Vegas Hooker. We just don't care.